Is Qualiopi certification mandatory for bidding?

Yes, for contracts funded by public or pooled funds (OPCO, France Travail, CPF). Qualiopi has been mandatory since 1 January 2022 to access public professional training funding.

Must trainer CVs be included in the proposal?

Yes, this is almost always required. CVs should focus on relevant experience for the contract: subject matter expertise, teaching experience, and audiences previously trained.

How to handle a multi-lot training contract?

Each lot requires a tailored technical proposal, even if programmes overlap. Customise the target audience, detailed programme, and assigned trainers for each lot. Copy-pasting between lots will be penalised.

Read time : 10 min

Updated on 7 October 2026

Training Technical Proposal: How to Win Public Sector Professional Training Contracts

Public professional training contracts — funded by regions, France Travail (employment agency), OPCOs, or local authorities — represent a considerable volume of accessible tenders for training providers and independent consultants. The technical proposal is particularly decisive because the buyer judges your ability to produce measurable results: certification rates, employment outcomes, skills development. This guide helps you structure a convincing response.

The market in figures

French public procurement open data, 12 rolling months as of 2026-08-28. Amounts and durations are medians.

1,845: contracts awarded
923: winning companies
254: active public buyers
80,000 EUR: median amount
48 months: median duration

What these figures tell you

With 923 winning companies for 1,845 contracts, a company wins on average 2.0 contract(s) per year in this segment.

The median amount of 80,000 EUR indicates the size of consultation to target first.

The median duration of 48 months shows how often these contracts return to tender.

The median is used rather than the average: a handful of very large contracts is enough to distort an average.

What the buyer evaluates in a training proposal

Unlike works contracts where a physical process is judged, training contracts evaluate your instructional design and ability to achieve human outcomes. Scoring criteria typically focus on: understanding of the target audience (jobseekers, career changers, public sector staff), learning progression and methods (face-to-face, remote, blended, work placements, simulations), trainer profiles and CVs, assessment tools (ongoing and final), and target outcome indicators (certification rate, 6-month employment rate).

The most common mistake: proposing a catalogue programme without adapting it to the specific audience described in the specifications.

Recommended structure for a training proposal

A high-performing training proposal covers:

Needs and audience analysis

Rephrase the buyer's objectives showing your understanding of the target audience: initial level, barriers to learning, career goals. If the contract targets jobseekers, show knowledge of France Travail schemes. For public sector staff, demonstrate understanding of service delivery constraints.

Detailed training programme

Set out the schedule hour by hour or day by day: objectives for each session, teaching methods (presentation, practical workshop, real case study, e-learning, simulation), materials used, and module articulation. Show progression from simple to complex.

Teaching team

Present each trainer with a targeted CV: experience in the subject taught, training experience (hours delivered, audiences trained), certifications (professional title, degree, accreditation). Teaching team quality is often the top scoring criterion.

Assessment and outcomes tracking

Describe your assessment tools: initial positioning, formative assessments during the programme, summative final assessment, certification where applicable. Specify your outcome indicators (pass rate, satisfaction, employment) and post-training follow-up if required by the contract.

Common mistakes in training proposals

Unadapted catalogue programme — Copy-pasting an existing programme without tailoring it to the audience and objectives in the CCTP is the number one cause of poor technical scores.

Unnamed trainers — Stating "an experienced trainer will be assigned" without naming anyone or providing CVs is insufficient. The buyer wants to know who delivers the training.

No outcome indicators — Not committing to measurable indicators (certification rate, satisfaction, employment) weakens your credibility. The buyer funds outcomes, not hours.

Forgetting accessibility — Not mentioning accommodations for people with disabilities is an increasingly penalised omission.

Maître AO: your training technical proposal structured automatically

Maître AO analyses your training tender documents and generates a proposal covering all expectations: audience analysis, detailed training programme, team presentation, assessment framework, and outcome indicators. Add your trainer CVs, similar contract references, and Qualiopi certification, then export a professional document ready for submission.

Analyse your training tender free

1 free analysis — No commitment

Analyse your training tender free →See pricing